Dignity in Dying: A Compassionate Conversation with Dame Prue Leith and Parliament’s Turning Point
- Two Women Chatting
- Jul 15
- 3 min read
In a heartfelt episode of Two Women Chatting, Michelle Ford sat down with Dame Prue Leith to explore a profoundly personal yet universally resonant subject: dignity in dying. Prue, celebrated for her culinary genius and vibrant advocacy, emphasises that the right to a dignified death is as fundamental as dignity in life. Reflecting on her own experiences, she shared:
“We all want to die in a dignified and in a loving way… We don’t want to schlep … to some industrial estate outside Zurich.”
This episode, released ahead of a crucial legislative moment, couldn’t be timelier.
Public Opinion & Real‑World Impacts
Polling consistently reveals that about 75% of Britons support legalising assisted dying, with similar backing across all constituencies. But while public sentiment is strong, medical opinions are more divided. Surveys show doctors and psychiatrists are almost evenly split on whether safeguards are robust enough .
On the ground, the human cost of the current ban is stark: estimates suggest 300–650 terminally ill patients die by their own hand each year in the UK, with thousands more attempting it. Around 50 travel to Switzerland annually to die under physician-assistance. As Prue poignantly noted: suboptimal palliative care still leaves dying people to endure “unrelieved pain” in their final months.
Safeguards & Scrutiny
Supporters argue that the bill introduces the world’s strongest legal safeguards - two doctor assessments, multidisciplinary panel oversight, psychological and social screening, and explicitly voluntary participation for all healthcare professionals. Implementation has been set back to 2029, allowing systems to be put in place and public confidence to grow.
Opponents, including disability campaigners, faith leaders, and some cabinet members, warn of a “slippery slope”, suggesting vulnerable patients could be subtly coerced and that safeguards may not be foolproof. The Archbishop of York urged Lords Spiritual to resist, warning that assisted dying could reshape the doctor‑patient contract and erode ethical norms.
Podcast as a Platform for Change
Prue Leith’s interview brings a human face to these debates. Her emphasis on autonomy, compassion, and avoiding “industrial estates outside Zurich” resonates deeply as voters and lawmakers wrestle with moral, medical, and legal complexities. The podcast is more than a conversation - it’s a catalyst: urging us to confront uncomfortable questions about compassion, choice, and the kind of society we want to live - and die - in.
The Terminally Ill Adults Bill now awaits further debate in the Lords—possibly facing amendments or delay, but buoyed by strong Commons momentum. After the Lords, it would need Royal Assent and a planned rollout by 2029. Meanwhile, advocates like Dignity in Dying and My Death, My Decision are campaigning for swift, safe adoption, while critics emphasise the need for more rigorous safeguards and enhanced palliative care.
By humanising the issue, Prue Leith reminds us that assisted dying is not abstract policy - it’s about our final days, our dignity, and our right to choose compassion.
How the Bill Progressed Through Parliament
Labour MP Kim Leadbeater introduced the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill on 16 October 2024 with the aim to legalise assisted dying for mentally-capable adults with less than six months to live. Following a robust second reading on 29 November 2024 (passing 330–275), the bill underwent detailed scrutiny during a 29‑sitting committee between January and March 2025.
Significant amendments included removing mandatory High Court approval and implementing a multidisciplinary panel review involving doctors, legal professionals, social workers, and psychiatrists. On 16 May MPs revisited amendments, and a month later—on 20 June—the House of Commons took a historic vote: 314 in favour, 291 against, marking only the first time such a bill passed the Commons.
It now moves to the House of Lords, where 26 Anglican bishops and seasoned peers will debate its passage.
Comments